Skip to content

When will we have a better justice system?

February 2, 2007

What has happened to the plans of the Indian government to set up an All-India Judicial service (IJS?) on the lines of the IAS?(Indian Administrative Service) A Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law and Justice had recommended this but I have not heard of any progress being made on this issue. At least it has not been highlighted in the media. Here is a quote from a six month old editorial: 

“If an all-India judicial service is created and judges are recruited directly on the pattern of the Civil Services examination by an independent and constitutional body like the Union Public Service Commission, our courts will attract more competent people to take over as judges.”

That our judicial system needs overhauling is not in doubt. Ofcourse there are some who actually believe that it is not our judges who are to blame…it is the shortage of judges which are to blame! True, the number of judges (per million population) here are the lowest when compared to more advanced countries. For example:

41.6 in Australia
75.2 in Canada
50.9 in England
107.0 in the USA
And India – 10.5

But as B.R. Lall (senior CBI official) explains in The Tribune, these statistics are terribly misleading. He writes:

“If we delve a little deeper into the statistics, the analysis does not support this superficial view. Serious crime per million of population is 81210 in Canada, 60970 in France, 17728 in Japan and 42668 in the USA as compared to 1790 in India. Even the total crime in India is only 6710 as against 302670 per million people in the USA. Similar is the trend of civil cases. ”

The truth is that India cannot be considered a fair and just society until the courts get their act together. How can we expect to be a global economony and expect foreign companies and their executives to come here if we cannot provide protection from criminal elements? I know that in some cases where foreign tourists (German girl’s rape by Bitti Mohanty) have been targeted, the courts have suceeded in ensuring speedy justice (Bitti was convicted although now he has jumped bail) but this doesn’t make much sense to me. Why should speedy justice be provided only in isolated cases? Justice has to be for one and all. And justice delayed is justice denied, specially in India. Here, when cases take decades to resolve, the guilty (who get bail) get sufficient time to buy witnesses and rig the case.
Only a Indian Judicial Service will ensure that only the best talent in the country become judges. In the meantime the present system needs to change. It is well-known that frequent adjournments and stays is one of the major reasons why cases get post-poned. Also, a fair number of judges posts are vacant.
I see a future where India puts in place a systematic, centralised examination which will recruit the brightest youngsters pouring out of law colleges for the job of a judge. That I think is our only hope. 

3 Comments leave one →
  1. B K Mishra permalink
    June 4, 2008 5:47 pm

    to save democracy it is imperative to have judiciary to be transparent. Indian judicary esp. lower judiciary is totally corrupt and going court means bribery on evey step for common man.

  2. BR Lall permalink
    January 16, 2010 1:08 am

    Is there any justification for 450 court hearings in the Ruchika case.3to 5 hearings should have been more than enough.If every time the court spent just an hour on this case ,it took 450 court hours.Court does not sit more than 5-6 hours a day.So this case occupied no less than exclusive and full 75 days of the court that will be the time spanned over 3.5 months after adjusting the holidays.Output of the court would be 4 cases in a year.Courts need to see this inside.The reasons lie the way they conduct.They should charter some Research agency to look into their procedures.In USA their brothers handle over 3000 cases in a year of which some 1200 are serios matters,whereas share of our judges does not exceed a total of 900 cases.
    Another issue is that courts do not have population function as education department has as everychild has to be educated .On the other hand the only job of the court is to hear the cases that are filed.The criterion for court work is not the population but the case


  1. The Great Indian Mutiny » The Archive » Indians believe their judiciary to be tainted

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: